View Full Version : Is it worth it to buy a non-turbo supra?
maXmood
August 31st, 2010, 11:54 AM
just like the title says.. model 94 or whatever/however they come.
is it worth it?
t88_power
August 31st, 2010, 11:55 AM
Other than slow like hell ?!? Yes
maXmood
August 31st, 2010, 12:01 PM
of course.. i'm talking about a project car for street use.
but what i'm saying is, if the 2 trims are available, for BD3k difference in price. would you still go for the turbo version?
t88_power
August 31st, 2010, 12:04 PM
I'm talking about a street car too ... turbo for sure
ED
August 31st, 2010, 12:14 PM
if you want speed go with the turbo, going from n/a to turbo at later stage will cost you will over 3k if you want a proper job done. that saqid, the n/a supra is reliable and generally a good car, but not much in the way of speed or fun.
maXmood
August 31st, 2010, 12:15 PM
So basically, turbo or it's not worth it..
ok, what's a good price range for a stock turbo?
BLOODLINE
August 31st, 2010, 12:54 PM
Turbo akeeed
A.Z
August 31st, 2010, 01:34 PM
just like the title says.. model 94 or whatever/however they come.
is it worth it?
kelesh LAAA2!!
wa latgol betsaweeh turbo.. la2ana el salfa ma teswa..
SAMoloGY
August 31st, 2010, 01:50 PM
I'm talking about a street car too ... turbo for sure
im surprised this is comming from u!!
why are u guys giving him wrong information?? yes it is worth it buying an NA supra.. esp if its clean, coz.. its a rare care and a rare platform. eventually ull swap a 2jz in it and a decent swap will set u back 1500-2000 max.. if ur picky u can swap out the breaks, diff and other components that come with the turbo Supra.
so in short, if its clean and the body is solid.. buy it! i had a supra, im talking from experience.
Splash
August 31st, 2010, 02:05 PM
but... if both cars (turbo and NA) were in same condition and the TT was more expensive with BD3000 extra... Get the turbo, coz it's ready and got an original TT engine with tranny along with the whole rear-end and the bigger brakes. The chassis number says it all too (in case u were thinking collector's) :)
Both ways.. it is a lovely car with huge upgrades potential
designo
August 31st, 2010, 02:31 PM
Twin cam all the way, reliable, powerful enough with mods.. and amazing for drifting!
Thug Life
August 31st, 2010, 02:45 PM
get the turbo if you have the cash if dont get the N/A and swap LS3
maXmood
August 31st, 2010, 02:49 PM
all i keep seeing is clean stock NA.. turbos are always modded, and if not, they're not so clean.
price goes up to 10k, which i think is a bit too much for a 16years old car.
Thug Life
August 31st, 2010, 02:52 PM
all i keep seeing is clean stock NA.. turbos are always modded, and if not, they're not so clean.
price goes up to 10k, which i think is a bit too much for a 16years old car.
10K for a rare car waid a7san min 245K $ for 1969 restored camaro
KLEEMANN
August 31st, 2010, 05:03 PM
you care about looks go N/A you will make great show car of it. power then turbo is you answer
I would go for clean turbo even for 10k if i had the money
designo
August 31st, 2010, 05:20 PM
hmmm.. now there's an idea Bu Fahad... NA Supra with an S85 swap!
ファルーク
August 31st, 2010, 06:58 PM
Max, is this the green Supra from Dubai?
hmmm.. now there's an idea Bu Fahad... NA Supra with an S85 swap!
ufff beyeqla3!
THE REAPER
August 31st, 2010, 10:30 PM
I owned a 95 N/A Supra and like what are members mentioned they are slow.
If the difference is less than bd2500 go for the turbo,
If its the looks you want its an awesome car if its N/A performance you want the 350Z is a much better car especially the 2007-08 models and they sell around the same price of a N/A supra.
Other than that you can still wait for the FT-86 coming around maybe next year with great looks and maybe similar performance of the N/A Supra
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.